Indian Polity – Emergency Provisions & Parliament vs Judiciary (Analysis)
Articles 352, 356, 360 | Judicial Review | Basic Structure Doctrine
1. Emergency Provisions in Indian Constitution
The Indian Constitution provides for emergency provisions to deal with extraordinary situations. These provisions enable the Central Government to assume greater powers to maintain stability and security.
- Article 352: National Emergency (War, External Aggression, Armed Rebellion)
- Article 356: President’s Rule (Failure of Constitutional Machinery in States)
- Article 360: Financial Emergency
During emergencies, the federal structure becomes more unitary, and the powers of the Central Government increase significantly.
2. Impact of Emergency Provisions
Emergency provisions can affect Fundamental Rights, governance structure, and democratic functioning. During National Emergency, certain rights can be suspended, and Parliament gains wider legislative powers.
While these provisions are necessary for national security, misuse can threaten democratic values.
3. Parliament vs Judiciary Conflict
The conflict between Parliament and Judiciary arises mainly over the extent of power in amending the Constitution. Parliament represents the will of the people, while Judiciary ensures constitutional supremacy.
This conflict has shaped key constitutional doctrines and strengthened democratic balance.
4. Judicial Review
Judicial Review is the power of the Supreme Court and High Courts to examine laws and declare them unconstitutional if they violate the Constitution. It acts as a check on legislative and executive powers.
5. Basic Structure Doctrine
The Basic Structure Doctrine limits the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution. Parliament cannot alter the fundamental framework of the Constitution.
This doctrine ensures that core principles such as democracy, rule of law, and judicial independence remain protected.
Shaktimatha Learning
No comments:
Post a Comment